Sunday, April 15, 2012

Hypnotic conformity: The social bombing of Americans (by anon)


Let’s face it - the majority of Americans are seduced by food, bad reality shows, new cars, magazines, flat screens, celebrities, fashion, physical appearances, and shitty sentimental rhetoric. Most people accept what they are told by the media. A lot of people think they have to be attractive and/or succeed financially (of course, what other kind of success is there?) to be honored or valued in society. Most people don’t have any idea of who they are or what they truly want, because they are constantly bombarded by stamps of society that work to define people and their needs artificially (mostly for the sake of capitalistic agendas, but that’s another story).

Most Americans are hypnotized by appearances, seeing substance and value in things like classy home décor and luxurious, pricey accessories to declare style and social worth. Many of us are instilled with values that have no use and thus no meaning. It's sad when people don’t see value in others who do not live up to social standards of excellence, as if those kinds of people are a disease of some sort. It is also sad when people can’t accept and are afraid of anything (or any person) that is different or unusual, or doesn’t seem to “fit in” with society, despite not being harmful at all. I want a society that embraces variety, differences, and uniqueness, a society in which it is customary to form actual relationships with the people we encounter, relationships that are soaked in meaning and sincerity instead of glossed with courtesy frosting (which eventually dries up and flakes off). I want a society that openly recognizes and understands that every individual is necessarily linked to everyone else, no matter the dress, physical traits, ethnicity, lifestyle, financial success, etc., because we’re all human, and we’re all products of differing life experiences, genetic makeup, and locations in space and time. I don’t want anything to take that uniqueness away from people, but every day in America we are constantly being stripped of and told to hide things that make us unique by being pressured to fit in and essentially forced to be molded into something we simply are not. And what bothers me more is that a lot of times, even when people try to be unique (because “unique” can be stylish too, you know), they are really adopting someone else’s idea (and bastardizing the whole concept) of uniqueness, rather than expressing their own true uniqueness. I’m tired of seeing more impressions of society in Americans than impressions of Americans in society.

We’ve got to realize that we don’t necessarily have to conform to survive, but the ideas shoved in our faces from the ruling class via the media are there to make us think otherwise. “They” want us to think that we need things we don’t need, “they” want us to think that we’re not OK the way we are without products to make us look better, and “they” want us to think that we have to make ourselves from the outside in and act the way society wants us to. Well I want to make one thing clear – we can only truly make ourselves from the inside out, and never the other way around. Once we know who we are on the inside, our selves will quickly take form on the outside, and we’ll never have to TRY to be anything. It is pretty cliché, but I’ll say it anyway: Find yourself, be true to yourself, and don’t buy in to what society is selling you if it doesn’t fit with who you really are.

Friday, April 13, 2012

Oh gross!! What did I just step in? (by anon)


So, I thought that sidewalks were meant for humans to walk on, wouldn’t you think so? I have become obsessed with watching where I walk to and from anywhere on campus, that is unless I am drunk. Well everyday walking to class I hope that you will now look out for what is on the sidewalk because you would be so grossed out!

Well first off, there is the spit that guys love to hack up onto the sidewalk rather than on the grass! Great, just what I want to step in is your boogers because you are too lazy to spit it in the grass! Then if you don’t step in that there is a good chance you are going to step in mud because apparently here on campus the sidewalks are meant for their vehicles to drive on. If it’s not a motor vehicle then you may have bikes that are on the sidewalks which I thought that you can’t do that because it’s illegal. Well the reason I say this is because last year on my walk in between Roseman Hall and the University Center to class I ended up getting hit by a girl on a bike in the back of my calf. This made it so hard to walk anywhere for a week and my calf was super bruised and swollen. Lastly, if you have somehow managed to avoid these obstacles in your path there’s a pretty good chance you could step in dog poop. Well the people who are handicapped on campus don’t have to pick up their dog poop or maybe they are required to but just would rather not? Well if their dogs don’t crap on the sidewalk, they are rudely pulling their dog while they are trying to go to the bathroom or someone steps in it and then smears it all over the sidewalks.

So in the end I believe we need to take back the sidewalks from motor vehicles, bicyclists, people spitting on the sidewalks and of course we should hire someone to pick up after the people that have dogs due to a handicap. Wouldn’t it be great to not stare at the sidewalk and worry about stepping on something nasty or getting run over on the way to class!? Also, wouldn’t it be great to offer someone a poop job anyways in this economy?

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

A Response to the Open Letter to Christians (by James Chambers)



[This is a response to Luce's challenges to Christianity a few posts ago.]

By James Chambers, InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, USA Campus Staff

In an Open Letter to Cru, InterVarsity, etc., the author brings up some points that as Christians we need to address. As a Christian I need to give reasons and evidence for the things I believe. In this post I want to give reasons why God may choose to not stop evil when he is all-powerful and loving, reasons why the Bible is God's Word and reasons that Jesus is God.

The Problem of Evil

The logical problem of evil and the existence of God has been shown by Christians and others to not actually be a problem. Just because we can’t see a positive or good reason for an evil doesn’t mean there isn’t one and that there isn’t a God. The author’s’s point seems to point toward why wouldn’t God stop pointless evil if he has the power to do so. Why does God sit passively by? This is the route I am going to go. Christian theology teaches that evil consists of both moral and natural evil. Natural evils are those things that seem to have no human cause but are a result of natural processes (earthquakes). Moral evils are those things that humans cause (murder).

For Christianity, the problem of evil (both moral and natural) is a result of sin. Christian theology teaches that God created the universe and all that is in it. When that creation was made, God said it was good, not that there was no potential for evil in it. God created humans in his likeness and in that likeness God created humans to have free will to choose between good and evil. I reason that if God created humans to have limited free-will (where they could only choose to do good), then humans were not made in the image of God but instead created to be robots. When humanity fell away from God by sinning it resulted in a fallen humanity and a fallen creation. Natural evils are a result of the curse put on the earth. Moral evils are the result of a fallen humanity continuing to choose evil. Even though God has the power to stop evil, to do so would be to remove humans’ free will and to stop the consequences for the sins of humanity. There is good news and that is that Jesus came to reverse the curse of sin once and for all. Through the death and resurrection of Jesus, God provided the ultimate solution to both moral and natural evil. Though both continue to exist for a set a time, the church has been called to bring healing to a broken world through its ministries of compassion.

The Bible is God’s Word

The next point I want to address is that the Bible is not God’s Word. I will show that the author’s claims that using the Bible to demonstrate itself as God’s Word is not circular reasoning (strike 4). The first reason that the author’s argument is wrong is that the Bible is not one book, but is actually 66 books, with different authors. When Christians use the verses cited by the author, these verses are stating that other books or collections of books are God’s Word. Therefore, this is not circular reasoning. So, in the end I can use Scripture to claim that it is the Word of God and there is no logical contradiction. Now the term ‘God-breathed’ is a tough Greek word to translate. The author is correct in that the term is rare. Most translators translate the Greek word literally. By that, they give a direct English translation of the word and not try to paraphrase it. Though the definition of the word is vague and we may not completely understand with one hundred percent certainty what it means (yet I reasonable think the context dictates that God is involved in the process of Scripture and uses the term Godbreathed to describe that process), the focus of the passage is what the purpose of Scripture is for.

This does not completely answer the author’s objection. I will now show why the evidence points that the Bible is God’s Word.

First, Jesus was a historical figure and not an imaginary person made up by Christians. He truly existed and the gospels give an accurate account of his life, death and resurrection. There are multiple criteria that the gospels satisfy in showing that the gospels do in fact depict the historical Jesus. The first criteria is that of multiple attestation. The gospels in many places look alike (but are not always word for word) as they depict teachings of Jesus and actions of Jesus. One example is the teaching of Jesus about God as Father (Found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul and extrabiblical sources). Second, the criteria of embarrassment shows that the early church would have removed those things that would have been embarrassing for them and it is unlikely they would have created such material. One such embarrassing encounter is when Jesus was betrayed by one of his own disciples. These help show that the new Testament is a reliable source. Second, since Jesus is a historical person and below I show that he is God, Jesus believes that the Old Testament is God’s Word. Jesus quotes the Old Testament and calls the Old Testament the Word of God (Mark 7:13). Jesus viewed the Scriptures as the written Word of God. Lastly, Jesus knew that his life was a continuation/fulfillment of what was written in the Old Testament and that his oral teachings would be written down so that they could be passed on to future generations. Jesus even promised his disciples that the Holy Spirit would come to guide them into all truth. This then makes it very likely that Jesus knew that the New Testament would become Scripture just as the Old. Thus Jesus believed in the Hebrew Bible (the Old Testament) as the Word of God, and knew that the recording of his own teachings would rightly be considered the Word of God.

To summarize: If the gospel accounts give us an accurate picture of the historical Jesus, the Son of God; and if Jesus looked back to the Old Testament and forward to the New Testament as the Word of God, then believers in Jesus should do the same.

Jesus is God

The author’s comments that no one worshipped Jesus as God until later as evidence Jesus is not God has no bearing on the divinity of Jesus. It is reasonable for Jesus to hide his divinity from humanity until after his death and resurrection to complete his mission. The author’s second claim that Jesus never calls himself God is also false. In John 8:48-59, Jesus claims to be before Abraham was even born. Now, either Jesus is thousands of years old or he is claiming to be God. The fact that those who heard him wanted to stone him, is evidence that this was considered blasphemous. Therefore, the claim that Jesus never stated he was God does not hold up when one looks into Scripture.

The author also points that the term begat/begotten does not show evidence that Jesus is God because all of humanity can say they are the son/daughter of God because God created us. However, the term begat is only used biblically to speak of things creating things of the same kind. Nowhere does it say that God begat humanity in Genesis. Genesis states that God created humanity. The only place where it says that God begat anyone is in reference to Jesus. Therefore, only Jesus can say that he is begotten of God. Your conclusion is incorrect that anyone can claim that.

It is very logical that Jesus did believe he was God, clearly taught that and the disciples and eventually the Church continued to teach that Jesus is God.

Conclusion

Again, I know I have only touched a few of the author’s points. But these are the major points and I have tried to show, briefly, that the problem of evil does not show that God doesn’t exist and that the reasons for pointless evil put humans on the hook for it, not God. Second, I tried to show that the Bible is God’s Word and lastly that Jesus did in fact claim to be God, and his claim was fully recognized by his contemporaries.

Monday, April 9, 2012

Reality used to be a friend of mine (by anon)


Dear Reality,

I know we've been friends a long time, and don't get me wrong I really like you, but there comes a point in everyone's life where they have to ask themselves if they've outgrown a relationship. I think that our time has come. Please don't take this badly Reality, I know that there are plenty of people out there who still believe in you. For me this simply isn't true. Every day I wake up and look at you and think "This can't be my Reality." I mean I grew up with certain expectations for my relationships. I need honesty, sincerety, genuine stuff you know? Every time I turn my head there you are doing something totally unacceptable. Like just this morning I looked at a news posting of a man who was sent to jail for tweeting some nasty remarks (some guy in England). Understandably people's sensitivities are important to recognize, but then again people say stuff they don't mean all the time. What I'm getting at is that I expect people to be able to put themselves in each others' shoes and perhaps reach some kind of understanding of each other. I cannot do this with you apparently. Some guy shot a kid the other day and the police just said, "go home we'll take care of it." I mean what the fuck man? What were you thinking? All this time I thought, you know, Reality just isn't that way, but here you are betraying my belief in you. It's okay though Reality, we can still be friends, I just can't be in a committed relationship with you o.k.? Maybe we can hang out every once in a while and talk about "the good ol' days" when we were still in grade school and we just accepted each other. Now that I think about it that's what's really been holding us together all this time. I've just accepted you. So it's not your fault Reality, it's me that's changed, not you.

Sincerely,
me

Saturday, April 7, 2012

TSA Worker Pat Down Not What It Seems (by anon)


A video was posted on YouTube Saturday morning that got over 500,000 views and has been stirring up controversy.  The video is from back in the spring of 2010 where a young boy with a broken leg in a wheelchair is being patted down by a TSA worker at the airport.  His father none other than Chicago radio personality Matt DuBiel took the video footage of his son being patted down and said he felt angered when watching the video.  He also wrote captions on the video such as “I was trying to comfort my son but the TSA officer said I could NOT touch him at all.” 

The reason I am pissed about this video is because it annoys me when people act stupid and take things out of context.  So what your kid is getting patted down at the airport?  Wouldn’t you rather be safe and have the TSA workers actually “do their job” instead of complaining that the worker was harassing your son.  The thing about his allegations is that they are totally false, he first told the newspapers that the incident happened at O’Hare Airport in Chicago, which it didn’t.  It happened at Midway airport, also when you watch the video of his son being patted down he looks like he is handling it very well and the TSA officer is being very friendly to the child. 

The part of the video that stirred up so much controversy is the fact that the father added subtitles to the video that made the situation seem so much worse than it really was.  Another caption the father added on the video was “he wouldn’t let me hold my son’s hand, so my son had to pretend this was “ok” and not panic.”  Sir your son was fine, I don’t know what video you were watching but your son is not panicking at all; if anyone is panicking it is you, not him.  The biggest factor in the whole ordeal that really pisses me off is that it happened in spring of 2010; no till September 2011 did the TSA change their rules on being more lenient when patting down smaller children.  That is why I can’t believe he is making a big deal about this; it’s not like this happened in 2011 when the rule for being more lenient was in place.  No, it happened in 2010 when there rules were to pat everyone down the same, heaven for bid the TSA worker actually follows the rules and does their job. 

As a person who personally flies a lot, I am happy that he patted down this kid in a wheelchair because that is exactly the place a person would keep an explosive device or something like that. This is because most people would not expect a small boy in a wheelchair to actually cause any harm to anyone, not saying that they do but you never know what will happen in this world today. On top of complaining that TSA workers harassed his son, when he posted the video to YouTube he titled it “TSA nabs suspected Al Queda terrorist.”  Seriously, this father really had the nerve to title this video including Al Queda’s name.  That is the one part of this story I find very unprofessional and really disrespects the TSA workers and the job that they do to help keep us safe.  I hope this father grows some sense and realizes that TSA workers aren’t there to try and harass your son; they are there to protect the citizens of America.   

Thursday, April 5, 2012

The Challenge (part deux)


I'm finding this call for a public debate on Christianity intriguing.  I'm posting the latest challenge by Luce here, and then moving over some of the comment thread.  Part one of this challenge can be found here: Part One
*************************************************

**The Concept of Jesus as Savior is Ridiculous if God Exists**

As the story goes, all humanity has a fatal flaw. Sin is sown into our very natures. You can call this "original sin" or more simply as humans just can't help but mess up. Since God is perfect, he can't take us into heaven in our unclean state. To fix this, God sent his son Jesus as a sacrifice so that we can be washed in the blood of Christ. This cleanses us into a state of perfection, a state worthy to be in the presence of God. However, and this is a big point, we can only be washed clean if we take Jesus Christ as our lord and savior. Belief in Jesus as God is REQUIRED for the sacrifice to work.

Unfortunately, this story does not work if God is supposed to be all powerful and unconditionally loving, as the New Testament makes God out to be.

First, if God is unconditionally loving, that means that God would never put a condition on his love. Since God wants us all to be in heaven where his perfect love is manifest, God would never put a condition on our path to get there. That would be putting a condition on God's love. However, if God requires that we first believe in his son in order to be blessed with the fullness of his love, then that's where we get a contradiction. God cannot both be unconditionally loving and requiring a condition for his love. I say that whole requirement part is bunk.

In fact, it is such bunk that if God is truly unconditionally loving, God would do away with all conditions and just whisk everyone to heaven when the time comes. Since God is all powerful, he can surely make it such that no sacrificial blood washing is ever needed. After all, God is God and can do anything. The whole "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son" schtick is really misguided. It basically means that God wasn't powerful enough to get around that sin thing without some major rigamarole. He could just snap his fingers and bring us all into heaven, all cleansed and perfect if he wanted to.

However, since the New Testament clearly doesn't have that God in mind, I call bunk on that too. If God actually exists, Jesus would be entirely unnecessary. It's time to flush Christianity.

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Just a little advice, dear Professor... (by anon)


Dear Professor who teaches ________,

I find it interesting that you would choose a profession that is intended to help students become successful in their particular area of study. Why do I think it is interesting? Perhaps it is the fact that when students are having trouble with the course and come to you for help and you reply with a rude e-mail that has accomplished nothing. 

I have some advice for you, Mr. _______.  When a student e-mails you asking for a little direction they ARE NOT judging they way you teach or your knowledge of the subject.  I am aware that you attended college and perhaps worked in the industry for some time. So, maybe next time you don’t have to reply so hostile.  Instead, maybe you could reply with exactly what they need. That is, students sometimes need a little push in the right direction. Simply put, how can I be successful in your class? Here, I can even help you…

“I see that you have had trouble on the past two exams, here is how I would approach the next chapters…[insert advice here]”

OR

“This might be a little difficult to guide you over e-mail, how about we set up a time to meet during my office hours.”

I understand how writing that can be very difficult for someone who has as big of an ego as you do, but just a suggestion—OH and actually, I have had professors in the past who have done this, silly right? And they are younger and have much less “experience” as you do.  Maybe you can take some notes on how REAL professors teach…I believe there are quite a few of them on campus and it would be right outside your office door. Like my parents always say, the learning never stops! Pick up a pad of paper and a pen and jot down some notes as to how successful professors, who don’t need huge curves for their students to pass, teach material.

Sincerely,

Hopefully I graduate!

P.S. Also, I forgot to mention it may be smart to end your e-mails with something a little more inspirational than, “To be honest, in the time left, you have little chance of raising your grade. In fact, given the material, you may have to work hard to keep it from falling.”