Albert
Einstein, Edwin Hubble,Marie Curie, Benjamin Franklin, Isaac Newton, Charles
Goodyear: what do these people have in common? Obviously, they are regarded as
great people, influential people who have shaped our understanding and
management of our world. There is something to be said for the human standing
in the shoes of the first person to say “Hey everybody, look at this!” We all
know the pleasure of being that person at one time or another. There is however
a difference between being great and standing in the shoes of greatness. Mrs.
Rudiselle, my fourth grade teacher, was great. You likely don't even know who
she is. Nonetheless, she is great. She made the world understandable for me. In
fact I can remember talking to her about this subject some 22 years after the
fact.
We
were learning about Leonardo Da Vinci and the subject of being a genius was on
the table. I asked her what it meant to be a genius. She said that Da Vinci
knew a little about a lot of things. He knew art, history, philosophy, science,
engineering, etc. He was not a specialist (one who knows a lot about one or two
subjects). I've lead my life under this impression of genius and it does not
fail to please, as I am always ready to take on the next challenge regardless
of whether it is in my “area of expertise” or not.
So
what of Goodyear, Curie, or Einstein then?
They were specialists. Expertise in a single area is what we now know
them for. Einstein was no doubt a genius, and had knowledge in many areas, but
why does the Mathematics of Physics stand out? Because it is useful to US.
You and I have the advantage of the use of the theories or inventions of “great
people” and therefore we extend the greatness of these advances to the very
name of the person credited with saying “Hey guys look over here, I found
something!” I do not wish to belittle the entirety of any great person, because
I am certain that even by my definition, most “great people” were really and
truly great people.
So
what is “my definition” of great then? I have in my mind the cliché “standing
on the shoulders of giants.” The giants are those we regard as great. But
really we are speaking of the height attained. If I could stand on a rock and
see as far, I would not consider the rock as great but merely as having been
the only thing it could have been. The choice to be great is the choice to hold
up your fellows. The choice to increase the knowledge and ability of humanity
or even just one other person is what it takes to achieve true greatness. So,
why am I talking about this? Who even cares? Well, I want you to be that
giant.
I
was speaking to one of the faculty at the college here and they informed me
that some of the professors are more research oriented and don't particularly
care for the teaching side of their profession. When pressed on this some even
claim that the students here “aren't up to snuff” basically saying “they're too
dumb to waste time on.” WELL, that's going to solve the problem isn't it? The
people making this claim are deliberately avoiding the choo-choo-train to
greatness. They don't want to be the giant, but rather the people standing on
the ground next to the rock. If their research happens to cure cancer, I say
“hooray!....but you still suck.” In fact the chances of someone bringing about
such a medical advance are purely dependent upon two things: luck and the
education of the pool of people. If you teach those around you to be excellent,
you yourself are lifted up in the current toward greatness. So I issue this
challenge to you: Dare to be Great.
This could be the subject of a future Commencement Address, nice to listen to while you are waiting to walk across the stage and then easy to forget while you try to live a normal life in an abnormal world.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad to see that you agree with me. Of course standing out as a human is not normal and easy to forget.
Delete