I would feel nothing. I would not
exist. It's a pretty simple answer to a pretty dumb question pro-lifers
like to ask to trip up pro-choice advocates.
To not exist is neither good nor
bad. It just is the case (in a negating
sort of way). So if I never existed, it
would never have mattered—to anyone. Of
course, existing now matters to me and others who love me, but if I never was,
I’d never care and neither would anyone else.
There would be no me. And that
would have been fine.
But to use the kind of argument as the
questions above give is to commit a gross error. It demeans women who have become pregnant by
telling them they have no free will over their bodies. In the (usually) well-intentioned efforts of
pro-life advocates to esteem the personhood of the unborn, they take away the
personhood of the already born. This is
a case of mixed-up priorities. To be
pro-choice means that one fully respects the personhood of the woman just as I
would want everyone to respect my own personhood.
I can say what I say because I
exist. But if I didn’t exist, so be
it. There would be no skin off my back
(literally and figuratively). Pro-lifers
need a new argument.